Here
are several articles written following the latest WSF, Porto Alegre
2003. Through them, we wish to illustrate the diversity of the Allies’
contributions to this event.
You will also find the short presentations of the
four Dialogue and Controversy Round Tables, which was one of the
innovations of this latest edition of the WSF.
|
After
Porto Alegre…
Alliance Presence at the World Social Forum
Gustavo Marin
Many
Workshop facilitators of the Alliance for a Responsible, Plural
and United World have participated in the World Social Forum since
its first opening in 2001 in Porto Alegre. Insofar as the central
idea of the WSF is to open places for dialogue, the elaboration
of proposals, debates, and for the reinforcement of alliances
and strategies, but as there is no attempt to draw up a common
position for the entire assembly, the Alliance Workshops have
in the WSF a privileged field to disseminate their proposals and
expand their networks.
In addition, several Alliance facilitators have
taken part in the organization of a number of continental and
regional Social Forums (Europe, Palestine, Africa, Amazonia, Argentina,
etc.). In particular, we initiated the organization of the Indian
Committee of the World Social Forum, which will be held in India
in January 2004.
The dynamics generated by the World and Regional Social Forums
are obviously strong, but they are also still somewhat fragile.
The diversity of the groups, networks, organizations, and movements
present at the WSF is increasingly important, but the presence
of Asians, Africans and Arabs, among others, is still too limited.
Intentions and desires are not matched by the necessary financial
means. The socioprofessional diversity is also increasingly diverse,
but some sectors are still completely or practically absent (the
military, company executives, religious leaders, etc.). The WSF
themes (for the conferences and seminars) coincided extensively
with those of the Proposal papers. The WSF organizers have announced
their determination to encourage and open up more space for comparing
ideas, for further discussion of the proposals and the means for
their implementation, and for a solid integration of the cultural
dimension in the Forum’s activities. There is still a way
to go before the objectives become reality, however, and in this
effort the Allies can play a very positive role.
Nonetheless, the Forums constitute one of the
most important global meetings where an emerging civil society
can seek its route. It is also a place for young people to rally
(the Youth Forum brought nearly 30,000 persons together in 2003).
And in addition to the Continental and World Forums, many local
and national forums materialize on a regular basis.
The contribution of the Alliance to this dynamics
can be very meaningful:
- The Proposal Papers and the Charter of Human Responsibilities
can be widely circulated with an significant magnifying effect
due to the presence at such Forums of thousands of people
and journalists.
- The Alliance contributes methodological know-how, which
has become essential for the Forums to improve the quality
of the debates and proposals. In particular, the tools that
we have developed—electronic forums of public debate,
mapping tools, record and experience management, etc.—are
all valuable contributions.
- The participation of Thematic Workshop and Workgroup facilitators
can afford a unique quality to the debates.
- The Alliance methods highlight innovative visions and practices,
with special attention to respecting diversity, which get
the best out of a true cross-cultural debate. This contribution,
which may seem rather obvious, is actually crucial because
one of the major dangers of this kind of dynamics is to be
hindered by intolerant and exclusive visions and practices.
We are convinced that our presence and our participation contribute
substantially to encouraging a democratic and respectful debate.
This constitutes, in our eyes, a major challenge.
- We encourage the development of an open and multiple forum
of the world civil society, where ideas, proposals, projects,
and alliances are born and are strengthened. This aspect,
as others, remains fragile. In the present period, marked
by the increasing danger of war, armed confrontation, and
economic globalization that aggravates inequalities, we feel
that it is important to avoid processes of simplification
and of closure with no perspective. The WSF contributes to
keeping perspectives open.
|