	accueil
	建议
	您的答复对问题单
		reponses auteur
		reponses date
		在您看来，联盟这种理念是否能否从实质和组织方式上满足当今时代的需要？
		您是否认为您的组织或本人参与这一联盟是有可能的或有意义的？
		您认为本章程建议的精神和脉络是否适当？
		您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处
		您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛？
		如可能，你愿意参与
		其他答复
	repondre
	Analytical Summaries

accueil > 您的答复对问题单 > 您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处

您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处

reponse de Robert WHEELER, Allie. United States , 2005年8月18日

| 同一作者 Robert WHEELER |

I think that it would be a mistake to have the FPH select or appoint the support and intercession group, especially considering that the existing members would select all new members of the group. This would be a most undemocratic process, which would just rekindle the problems we have had with the lack of accountability or too much authority residing independently with the FPH. In other words, it smacks of cronyism and we oppose it constantly in our domestic government institutions.

I would think that it might be Better to say anyone that has been an active Allie for at least 3 years can vote on the nominees rather than to have the FPH decide. Then we could set some criteria by which Allies can be nominated and will be considered by the voters.

Also the participation in the Alliance in North America is not very well developed. For example, there is much more participation in Latin America and most of the time the representative would probably come from there. Thus I would suggest that you consider including an additional person who would come from North America - the idea being to encourage the Alliance to continue to expand its participation in the US, Canada, and Mexico. It would also give a better intercontinental balance.

- alliance -
- fph -