	accueil
	建议
	您的答复对问题单
		reponses auteur
		reponses date
		在您看来，联盟这种理念是否能否从实质和组织方式上满足当今时代的需要？
		您是否认为您的组织或本人参与这一联盟是有可能的或有意义的？
		您认为本章程建议的精神和脉络是否适当？
		您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处
		您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛？
		如可能，你愿意参与
		其他答复
	repondre
	Analytical Summaries

其他答复

reponse de Betsan MARTIN, Ally, New Zealand , 2005年6月4日

| 同一作者 Betsan MARTIN |

The Constituent Charte, Working procedures and Common Calendar all reflect the FPH and Alliance discussions in which I have participed. Allies requests for involvement in the next stage of the Alliance, including governance procedures, are reflected in these proposals. Appreciation to the Board and to Pierre Calame for the way in which the many contributions have been responded to and incorporated.

Presumably there will be clarification of working procedures of guarantors as the group take up the responsabilities of the role. There may need to be occasional meetngs of this or other working groups to make the work more effective. It seems that the guarantors could have a mentoring and accopanying role with Allies to support the Constituent Charter.

I would be very pleased to be a guarantor, and would prefer to take up on the role in addition to being a member of the Steering Commitee of the Charter for Human Responsabilities in this region and co-ordinating te Charte NZ, the Pacific and Australia (Oceana).

If there is a need for extra contributions to the Alliance Annals ot the 2006-7 Strategy, I would consider the additional work. This is to be realistic about Charter commitments and my interest in continuing to represent this South Pacific region in Alliance fora.

- alliance -
- fph -