|
||
August
31st, 2001 |
The
meeting of the Inter-religious College of the Alliance
One enriching aspect was due to the diversity of participants. First, confessional plurality. They belonged to different religious families: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Hinduism, Sikh, Baha'i, traditional Religions, Zoroastriens. Then, to a diversity of situations : they came from very different countries, as India, Costa Rica, China, Italy, Indonesia, Brazil, Switzerland, Algeria, Russia, etc. As well as to the diversity of milieux, of experiences, etc. The meeting didn't take place according to the classic linear method, following which there are some proposed topics of discussions, a discussion focused on pre-established topics and a final approval of texts. It took place creatively. The interventions of Pierre Calame brought a lot of opening to the meeting giving new perspectives. Several processes took place during the meeting, making it evolve day after day towards interesting results. Two among them must be underlined: A process on the content of the meeting. The organizers had proposed 3 themes of reflection: cross-culturalism, internationalisation and peace. Thanks to the conferences of the morning, to the groups' work, to the plenary in the afternoon and testimonies in the evening, other important questions emerged. The three proposed themes served, in fact, as entrance doors to tackle other questions that, from the concrete situations of participants, proved to be essentials : the biosphere and the environment, challenges of global governance, bioethics issues, phenomena of domination or war where the religion is used as a justification to mobilize people, etc. The exercise of the CARTOGRAPHY of the alliance proved to be an efficient tool to open the reflection to the complexity and the interaction of challenges of tomorrow's world. From a thematic approach as a "list of problems", the meeting passed to a complex approach emphasizing interactions between problems, actors, proposals, etc. A
process on the method of the meeting. From a theoretical approach of
questions, by which participants were going to think about precise themes,
the meeting passed to a strategic approach where participants, discovering
themselves committed to the future of the humanity, stood in terms of
action. The primary question was expressed according to the formula
These two processes had the consequence that participants didn't adopt a thematic process and didn't place themselves in a position of autonomy. On the one hand, establishing that this are not the only theories but actions that have transforming capacities, they put the necessity of an active engagement of their part forward. On the other hand, noting the links and the complex interactions of the challenges for the future of humanity, they emphasize necessity to commit together, in a perspective of alliance with believers of all religious families as well as with non-believers, for the construction of a responsible, plural and united world. As we shared a delicious raclette at the end of the meeting, two sentences came back often: "To be religious is to be inter-religious ". "To be religious it to be responsible ". |
|