	accueil
	建议
	您的答复对问题单
		reponses auteur
		reponses date
		在您看来，联盟这种理念是否能否从实质和组织方式上满足当今时代的需要？
		您是否认为您的组织或本人参与这一联盟是有可能的或有意义的？
		您认为本章程建议的精神和脉络是否适当？
		您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处
		您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛？
		如可能，你愿意参与
		其他答复
	repondre
	Analytical Summaries

accueil > 您的答复对问题单 > 您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛？

您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛？

reponse de Robert WHEELER, Allie. United States , 2005年8月18日

| 同一作者 Robert WHEELER |

In terms of selecting strategic lines and action priorities, I think that this is a very good proposal; but again there must be a way by which we can discuss the various input and proposals both before and after the facilitation committee does its work. Also, there is the question of conflict of interest. Can the proposers of initiatives also serve on the facilitation committee? What is to ensure that they would do their best to consider all of the proposals equally rather than to favor their own? And if the proposers would not be included on the Committee, then how can we ensure that they have an opportunity to participate actively in the discussion and consideration process?

- alliance -
- fph -