Here
are several articles written following the latest WSF, Porto Alegre
2003. Through them, we wish to illustrate the diversity of the Allies’
contributions to this event.
You
will also find the short presentations of the four Dialogue and
Controversy Round Tables, which was one of the innovations of this
latest edition of the WSF.
|
We
are faced by a major economic and financial crisis: what kind
of crisis is it? What are the alternatives?
Memo presenting the problem
The scandals and crisis that are affecting
major corporations and the world financial system are the signs
of the intrinsic limits of the global economy, which has been
built purely serve this same system.
Since the end of the seventies, strategies have
been defined and policies have been implemented with the aim of
restructuring the hegemony of capitalism. The foundations of a
system have been laid that places the major private economic and
financial corporations at its center, under the aegis of the free
market, primarily aimed at seeking increased productivity and
unrestricted competition by accumulating huge concentrations of
wealth and power on a global scale. To do this, liberalization,
privatization, deregulation and the reduction of the role of government
in economic regulation have become the keywords of an all pervading
neo-liberal dogma. This has resulted in the economic health of
businesses, the economies of nations and their governments being
assessed on stock markets according to the standards and rules
of speculation, whose legitimacy relies purely on maximizing profits
at the expense of any other criterion. The privatized world, considered
as one huge market, has become a kind of global casino. As casinos
usually go bust, so has this system. Fictional company accounts,
spectacular bankruptcies, sudden slumps in company share values:
the exuberance and fragility of this globalised capitalism appear
to be its inherent characteristics. What kind of crisis is it
and what are the underlying causes?
Crises are a fundamental component of the capitalist
system. The novelty of this new crisis is that it affects the
entire world at the same time. Still worse, apart from the fact
that it is global, the central issue of the current crisis concerns
the capacity to propose a project, and the power, policies, processes
and structures imposed by force by neo-liberal globalization.
There is no escape for anyone. Despite the enormous diversity
of situations around the world, no people, nation, society or
government can distance itself from this crisis. What can be done
to withstand it? How can the major corporations be brought under
control? How can economies be freed from the speculative and destructive
logic of the world financial system?
A basic question, made even more poignant
by the current crisis, is that of the precedence of the economy
over society.
We live in a paradoxical world where society
must serve the economy rather than the reverse. The divorce is
so radical that never before in human history has productivity
been as disassociated from human needs. The main characteristic
of current capitalistic globalization is to accumulate without
producing anything, by simply speculating on the economic health
of whole sectors and entire populations. The height of absurdity
is reached with the rise in value of a multinational corporation's
shares after it make announces that it is going to restructure
its business and massively downsize its workforce. We must not
forget the many tax havens that surrounds the main international
economic-financial centers, where the dirty money of this economy
can be laundered, generated by an economy that obeys only one
law, that of the owners of capital. From the social point of view,
the crisis of labor relations caused by this economy, with massive
exclusions on a global scale -unemployment, insecure jobs, migrations,
etc.- is a sign of the intrinsic limits of capitalistic globalization.
We have now come to a dangerous crossroads of
civilization, where the problem is not simply economic. For the
first time humanity is no longer confronted with a problem of
scarcity in satisfying people's needs and rights, but rather a
method of producing and distributing abundance. This is to say
that social inequality, in terms of inequality of access to the
economy, the use of natural resources and the goods and services
produced is in fact a problem of unequal economic power. There
is no lack of resources; on the contrary, it is the method of
managing them, resulting from unequally shared power, that has
led to this shameful global concentration of economic wealth.
Poverty is not the fruit of scarcity but that of the system's
intrinsic economic unfairness. Our central economic problem is
that of combating inequality, by revealing the dimension of power
embedded in the relations that fuel this global economy. We are
faced with myriad interlocking social inequalities – between
classes, genders, ethnic-racial groups, and between countries.
What kind of economy should be built to serve society?
The world economic system is neither socially
nor ecologically sustainable
Confronted by the current crisis we can see to
what extent societies have lost the power to formulate policies
via democratically elected national governments to the profit
of non-elected global economic institutions. This results in accelerating
the concentration of wealth between fewer hands and widening the
gulf of inequalities and exclusion on a global level, accompanied
with the increasing destruction of our common heritage and natural
resources. It is not only the sustainability of the system that
is now at stake, but life itself.
What should be done to ensure that natural and
social sustainability becomes the essential condition for organizing
the economy? Are the alternatives proposed compatible with the
dual goal of combating inequalities and recognizing rights for
all and the preservation of natural resources? Can democracy,
by giving precedence to all human rights for everyone, be an alternative?
Is building global citizenship and democracy enough to create
new foundations for an economy with sustainable social and environmental
horizons? Can the major transnational firms and the current financial
system withstand such a democratic change? And how?
The world is not a saleable item! What alternatives
can be built?
The huge crisis we are now facing has revealed
the limits of considering everything as saleable: in addition
to goods and services sold and purchased on the market, all relations,
processes structures, common property and even nature and life
itself have been transformed into merchandise. However, the worst
is that the very image of neo-liberal globalization and the power
of its ideology are presented as unique and unavoidable. The domination
of mercantile thinking specific to neo-liberal ideology and practices
appears to dominate everything, from material life to heart and
soul. This is what innumerable social actors are fighting against,
in different and contradictory ways, in genuine coalitions of
a new type. Old and new movements are uniting to say No! Enough
is enough! Can these revitalized social movements contribute alternatives
to the present crisis? Furthermore, how can these alternatives
be implemented?
|