	accueil
	建议
	您的答复对问题单
		reponses auteur
		reponses date
		在您看来，联盟这种理念是否能否从实质和组织方式上满足当今时代的需要？
		您是否认为您的组织或本人参与这一联盟是有可能的或有意义的？
		您认为本章程建议的精神和脉络是否适当？
		您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处
		您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛？
		如可能，你愿意参与
		其他答复
	repondre
	Analytical Summaries

accueil > 您的答复对问题单 > 您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处

您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处

reponse de Oriol ALSINA, Aliado. España , 2005年5月13日

| 同一作者 Oriol ALSINA |

Great, although I would assign different priorities to these 5 objectives:
Urgent:

1. define the governance
2. to support the future development of the Alliance

Medium:

3. to structure the connections and the debate

Then ongoing:

4. to enhance the workingmethods
5. to build the memory

I am most amazed and disappointed that the goal “support the future development of the Alliance” does not make any reference to funding!!!!!... Yes, we need good rules, but we need funding other than FPHs too.

As you may know, I have undertaken a cofunding mission for the Alliance for over two years now and the results have not been what we expected. As the FPH position text mentions, the innovative approach of the Alliance and the identity confusion between FPH/Alliance make it difficult for traditional funders to support our work.

Knowing how difficult it is, but also how crucial for the future of the Alliance, I propose that one of the working procedures deals specifically with this issue. That is where I could participate more actively. Let’s not be afraid to talk about rules, but let’s not be afraid neither to talk about money.

- alliance -
- fph -