|
|
0 commentaires | |
... 如可能,你愿意参与
|
2005年5月13日 | en |
Yes.
Interested in being part of a created Cofunding comitee or group
0 commentaires | |
... 您认为本章程建议的精神和脉络是否适当?
|
2005年5月13日 | en |
Objectives: I like the “principle” of linking the identity of an ally to its contributions, as modest as it would be. Regarding the “finding”, I would say that dialogue and joint work are one of the ways - the most ethical one - to bring forth viable alternatives, but there are others. Our way is not the only one.
Ethics: It is curious that most principles apply to the internal functioning of the Alliance and very few are general ethical principles which can be applied both externally and internally like “promoting a culture of peace and cooperation”.
0 commentaires | |
... 您对于以下各项存在哪些不同意见或不解之处
|
2005年5月13日 | en |
Great, although I would assign different priorities to these 5 objectives:
Urgent:
Medium:
Then ongoing:
I am most amazed and disappointed that the goal “support the future development of the Alliance” does not make any reference to funding!!!!!... Yes, we need good rules, but we need funding other than FPHs too.
As you may know, I have undertaken a cofunding mission for the Alliance for over two years now and the results have not been what we expected. As the FPH position text mentions, the innovative approach of the Alliance and the identity confusion between FPH/Alliance make it difficult for traditional funders to support our work.
Knowing how difficult it is, but also how crucial for the future of the Alliance, I propose that one of the working procedures deals specifically with this issue. That is where I could participate more actively. Let’s not be afraid to talk about rules, but let’s not be afraid neither to talk about money.
0 commentaires | |
... 您是否同意以具名或匿名的方式将您的回答和评论公布于有关章程建议的集体论坛?
|
2005年5月13日 | en |
Agree, we need a calendar and overall strategic orientations. These should be decided once the governance structure has been defined.
0 commentaires | |
intro traductions